With such structures, members will willingly submit their views, whereby accountability and democracy will give leaders the necessary incentives to tackle issues. However, studies have shown the welfare of any society can be well addressed through democratic institutions, with security, healthcare, and education being the requisites. A subject that requires critical analysis is whether dictatorship regimes have the ability to realize massive economic growth. Therefore, it is critical that countries that perceive Singapore as a model reevaluate their stand. In the case study, he argues that it is possible for a country to secure development before guaranteeing human, civil and political rights.

Sen insists that the five categories of freedom are interrelated and should be implemented simultaneously, and he uses “Lee Thesis” to expound. Political freedom is necessary when issues are to be weighed to come up with a determination that will be considered legitimate, with edification and social opportunities for parties engaging in such discussions (Sen 7). This demonstrates the interconnectivity of the five categories of freedom, as aforementioned. The author emphasizes that regardless of the decision that the community comes up with, it will be a completely developed country as long as such determinations were arrived at the environment full of freedom. This is a huge statement, and to put it into readers’ perspective, he provides a case where a local community contemplates abolishing its standard way of life for purposes of enhancing living standards. Sen bypasses the value of judgment, which is conventionally used to define a developed country, and puts much emphasis on a country’s level of development, for this takes local decisions into consideration.

Sen development as freedom summary